Should welfare programs be eliminated

An Update to the Budget and Economic Outlook: to National Taxpayers Union Foundation and U. April 23, Appendix, Budget of the U. April 2, Downsizing the Federal Government. January 15, Brady, Demian. National Taxpayers Union Foundation. May 12, Competitive Enterprise Institute. October 6, Fiscal Year Terminations, Reductions, and Savings. Congressional Research Service. July 29, My parents are bankrupt and we barely have any money to sugar or flour or even laundry detergent.

It is so hard when you can only go grocery shopping once or twice a year. Welfare has helped us so much because my parents need to pay the bills, the debt, the loans, and the rent. So my family and I can live in a house with food and warmth. Welfare helps us so much. Eliminating welfare can eliminate all these things it's not fair at all.

Welfare programs aren't just for single mothers hoping to gain an extra buck while neglecting their child. Welfare helps low-income families in a wide variety of ways that while they might seem odd, can be very helpful. Welfare programs include job corps, a free program to provide education and job training for year olds. Welfare provides college scholarships to low-income families so that a child can get a college education and eventually, a well paying job.

Welfare provides food stamps so that a family can eat without having to dig through the trash. Most families in poverty can't afford a college education, but without a college education, it is hard to find a good-paying job to properly support yourself.

Without a good paying job, you can't afford many basic necessities middle and upper class citizens take for granted, like food and a roof over your head.

Welfare provides a wide variety of programs that help low-income families so they can provide for themselves and seek a higher-quality of life.

Why should people work hard and pay taxes for people that don't work and possibly sell drugs. So what if people need it ,people work hard to make a living for THEIRE family not for some crack head that t has no job or that sells drugs for a living. People are hazy on facts, and large on pickpocket rhetoric. The Constitution states that Congress has the responsibility to provide for the "general welfare. We, as a society, make decisions about where to apply our collective wealth.

We decide to fund a behemoth military industrial complex, because we fear minor threats and like to project strength, and because these powerful institutions play these emotions in us like a fiddle. We subsidize international corporations corporate welfare because they control the means of production and provide some of their profits to support employment, although mostly they benefit a small elite of share holders.

To blame the poor for their poverty is a convenient lie that makes us feel superior, and is based in fear that we are all one step away from being poor ourselves. It isn't that we as a society don't have enough wealth, it's that the system is rigged to concentrate that wealth into the hands of the few.

When Walmart doesn't pay its employees enough, we subsidize them by providing food stamps to their employees and giving them tax breaks. If labor unions were stronger, and corporations were required to pay a living wage, the need for welfare programs would decrease.

But so long as the corporations have all the money and the power, welfare is the only ethical choice to support the needy.

Here in this county in Oregon, food stamps are abused!! Nobody but lowlife druggies use food stamps because they can't pass a drug test to get a job! Or a life! Some of these people have kids for Christ's sake! It's not that hard! Welfare can prevent individuals from going bankrupt which would damage our economy. Yes, children deserve nourishment no matter how lazy or terrible their parents are. Yes, fraud exists and part of the reform I'd propose would serve to eliminate it to the maximum ability it will never be perfect.

Yes, abuse exists Foodstamps should not allow luxury or desserts. I'm not saying just government cheese but not birthday cake or ice cream. Sorry, don't need it! It should be similar to unemployment in the requirement for working, except in cases where it's not possible, such as physical disabilities or where child care absolutely requires a non-working household in extreme cases.

Those cases should be the exception, not the rule. By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Google Search. Post Your Opinion. Create New Poll. Sign In Sign Up. Add a New Topic. Should welfare programs be eliminated? Welfare should be banned. Report Post. Like Reply. Many are either strong advocates for welfare or they despise the federal aid. Several believe that welfare isn't effective in training to get a job, or to improve circumstances. From my observation, more people support the idea of the program, but not the way the system distributes the federal money.

After the Great Depression Era, President Franklin Roosevelt implemented a governmental aid program now known as welfare. When the program was first implemented, it was for those who had been immersed by poverty from the depression. Throughout this program the government also offered jobs to help you make it through certain difficult circumstances.